Chris Edwards wrote: > On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > | Yeah, this is just the UCEPROTECT folks being muppets. I'm with Nigel; > | they're best ignored. > > The classic DNSBL argument! Assuming they are muppets, they will > ultimately be ignored, with few mail admins using them to block. If > however enough mail admins are using them to block as to cause pain to > those listed, then one might at least sit and think whether or not their > listing policy has some merit afterall. >
If you are going to run an RBL to list spammers then that's fine. If you are going to use the same RBL to advance a political ajenda then that's not fine. If a vendor lists servers in their spam RBL that they know aren't spammers then they are muppets. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
