On 17/10/06, Renaud Allard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Stuart Gall wrote:
<snip> > > > > Now obviously if they do not accept DSN's undeliverable messages will > > be frozen on our server and so this should be rejected. Personally I > > would be quite happy to leave it at that. However one of my clients > > wants to be able to receive mail from two such domains. > > > > So I was wondering if anyone else has came across this strange tactic. ? > > If it becomes more widespread then perhaps we need an option to > > specify the from address in sender callouts. > > I did come into such a problem. The resolution is quite simple, just > contact the owner of these domains (IE: cc the postmaster of these > domain when you send the evidence of their non compliance to > rfc-ignorant.org) and ask them to correct their mail servers. > For an example of a warning mail, you can look at > http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/tools/detail.php?domain=asicorp.com&submitted=1161039519&table=dsn > (yes, I do submit them automatically and there are many per day) A side benefit of dsn.rfc-ignorant.org is that you can use that DNSBL as a 'whitelist' to skip around your callouts, since you won't get any useful information from calling out to domains that are listed there. Peter -- Peter Bowyer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
