W B Hacker wrote:
> > Our error messages *might not* be specific if the nature of our tests turned > up > things that classified the source as a probable spammer or 'probe'. > > Your specific server had been so classified here 27 September 2006 for > sending > to a non-existent address that was clearly intentionally 'constructed', not a > mis-spelling of a valid user. You probably mean generated by a rule like that !verify = sender/callout=20s,defer_ok,random ohh, callouts again :)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
