David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 04:31 +0800, W B Hacker wrote: > >>>May have been the 10s timeout, though I don't see SRS on your recent traffic >>>- >>> >> >>- until I looked in the *recent* rejectlog, anyway..... >> >>Other than here, how is SRS working out for you? > > > Perfectly. I obviously don't do it on forwarded traffic -- it's only on > my own outgoing mail. I send nothing from [EMAIL PROTECTED]; it's all > from SRS-signed addresses. > > I get no bounces to mail I didn't send, and people who bother with > callouts will accept no fakes. I don't recall any occasion when it was > actually _live_ without accepting responses, so I'd be interested to > know what you think happened last July. >
loglines coming to you off-list. Only obvious 'hit' was the sender verification fail, thoug that was a 'production' server so only about 10% of the detail an 'instrumented' server's logs capture. Not that *everyone* was passing sender verify, but most were. Reason we dropped it was not about the RRC 'politics' or certainly not resource load - just that results were too erratic to depend on w/o monkey-motion and whom/whom-not lists. Bill -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
