On 19/10/2006 15:51, Chris Lightfoot wrote: > On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 03:44:11PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: >> On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 15:37 +0100, Chris Lightfoot wrote: >>> well, the configuration of filtering has to live in the >>> MUA, as it must be under the control of the user. >> I think that applies only for management-types, who are often found to >> be incapable of direct control over anything except by means of an MUA. >> >> The rest of the human race can cope just fine. > > um. I think by definition the interface between the mail > system and its users (as opposed to other mail systems, > the OS, etc.) is the MUA, isn't it?
Not sure I'd call vi an MUA, but I sometimes use it to manage my filters, and that's my interface with the mail system, isn't it? Cheers, John. PS. Whew, thank goodness it's quietened down a bit in here :-) and apologies for this noise :-b -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
