On Sat, Oct 21, 2006, SeattleServer.com wrote: >> on a private mailing list, someone raised the claim Exim has a bad queue >> handling and relies on delivering the mail in the first attempt. The >> discussion was about greylisting and "using" the queue of the remote site.
>> Speaking accross the board, is it true that Exim has bad (it need more >> resources) queue handling? For Exim on the sender site, is greylisting a >> problem? [...] > I think that the ideal situation would be to use exim still for the MSA > (accept authenticated connections from client), but then use qmail to route > all outbound E-mail, both from our servers as well as the MSA. But that's an > ideal I live without for now. Would using qmail as a smarthost help? Not sure if overhead wouldn't outweigh the benefits, though. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
