On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, Thomas Hochstein wrote: > > Not bad, but not very sophisticated either. Exim has a single queue, > and each queue runner will try every message in order to check and try > to resend it, when its retry time has been reached. The larger the > queue gets, the longer that will take. >
(wild off the cuff stuff that I don't know enough about filesystems to say if this would improve stuff) If exim has to look at the file to see if a new delivery attempt is due, would it be faster overall (for queue ops) to instead reflect that information in the -H filename, and just have exim update that as needed? Queue runners then don't need to open the file to check - they should know via a dir scan, which they've already done. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Dave Lugo [EMAIL PROTECTED] LC Unit #260 TINLC Have you hugged your firewall today? No spam, thanks. -------------------------------------------------------- Are you the police? . . . . No ma'am, we're sysadmins. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
