On 10/26/06 4:58 AM, "Graeme Fowler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, but something much more interesting exists in these log snippets: > >> 2006-10-26 10:40:29 J7QIRH-000428-FA <= [EMAIL PROTECTED] H=tid.hi.inet (tid) >> [10.95.64.10] P=esmtp S=146989 >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > OK, the message arrives and is 146989 bytes in length. Great. Now it > gets passed to mailman: > >> 2006-10-26 10:40:30 J7QIRH-000428-FA => |/home/mailman/mail/mailman.exe post >> test-list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> R=system_aliases T=address_pipe >> 2006-10-26 10:40:30 J7QIRH-000428-FA Completed > > And now it comes back from mailman: > >> 2006-10-26 10:40:32 J7QIRK-00035C-O4 <= [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> H=localhost (kitano.hi.inet) [127.0.0.1] P=esmtp S=67197 >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Notice - as you did - the truncated nature of the message. It's almost > certainly mailman itself, or an interaction between Exim and mailman > which is causing this. Well, the filtering out of the HTML part of the message (which I assume is there since Richard is using Outlook Express, which wants to do that), would roughly cut the message in half. But Richard says his Mailman isn't set to strip the HTML part. My next idea (pending seeing the Mailman screen shot) would be to resend that test message, but increase its size (copy from the sent mail (not the message as received back), and paste twice into a new message should do it), and see what happens. I'm still bothered, though, by the original message about ALL messages being truncated at 47K. And then do the same after forcing Outlook Express to send plain text only for the test message. The only other thing I can think of is some odd interaction among Exim, Mailman, and Cygwin. --John -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
