I added a little snippet to my ACL to
require HELO/EHLO before MAIL (it was
posted here the other day IIRC but it
might have been from the archive).
acl_check_sender:
deny condition = ${if \
or{{!def:sender_helo_name}{eq{$sender_helo_name}{}}}{yes}{no}}
message = HELO/EHLO required.
accept
where acl_check_sender is the MAIL ACL.
So, I am now seeing the expected rejects
in my logs. But tonight I receive a
(spam) message with this header:
Received: from [210.115.37.13]
by [etc...]
Where a helo'd version would look like:
Received: from [210.115.37.13] (helo=elsewhere.net)
by [etc...]
How did it get through without a HELO?
TIA,
-dub
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
