On Thursday 26 October 2006 01:57, W B Hacker wrote: > and, of course, the 'general case' - that of using, instead of port 25, > port 24 - which was set aside for that purpose [1] long ago - so as to > segregate such traffic from the 'rest of' the smtp arrivals.
s/24/587/. -- SeattleServer.com Mailing Lists - Casey Allen Shobe [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://seattleserver.com -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
