SeattleServer.com wrote: > On Thursday 26 October 2006 01:19, Martijn Grendelman wrote: >> If you use SpamAssassin: it has a number of DATE_IN_PAST* and >> DATE_IN_FUTURE* tests. > > This is what I use... but I learned by flat out rejecting on them (by upping > the scores for those tests) that some senders indeed have bad times. > > An interesting thing we encountered was a sender hitting one of those as well > as the INVALID_DATE header rule. Turns out they were leaving the timezone > off of their mailing list software-generated date header, and while they were > sending with a valid PST timestamp, our servers run in UTC so without knowing > the timezone, figured it was 9 hours off. >
Similar experience, but neat 'just discovered' feature, (yeah - slow learner on some things.. probably been there for years...) MozMail ==> SeaMonkey MUA has a setting to place incoming messages in 'order of arrival', so at least the mail *reader* now prevents buried-down-the-list or hog-the-top-spot presences. Bill -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
