Stuart Gall wrote: > On 31 Oct 2006, at 01:45, W B Hacker wrote: > >> Even so, by munging the call names, (spamd0, spamd1?, spamd2)? on >> different IP >> and/or sockets, (TBD) ....one could probably scan a message more >> than once, >> using different instances of SA, each tailored to different test >> suites. > > This is an example where you can use > spam = user > > just set up N users spam1 ..... spamN > each user has their own local.cf > > then scan with spam = spamX > >
Yes, built-in from ..day one? But what I had in mind would also select (at least) a different: init.pre 10_misc.cf 50_scores.cf v3XX_pre ...if not more, i.e. seriously different slant to what it performs and what each test is 'worth', no more than 3 sets, probably. No point in tracking beetles with a magnum rifle. Bill -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
