On 03/11/06, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 2, 2006, at 3:48 PM, Peter Bowyer wrote: > > > On 02/11/06, Mar Matthias Darin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> It is the standard server signature that goes out on all messages > >> that leave > >> this system. > > > > Does that make it right? > > Since when is it YOUR responsibility to criticize another's .sig > file, especially one only a few lines long ???
Am I not entitled to an opinion? I have to read it. Is it the absolute right of anybody to say anything they care to in their emails whithout inviting comment? Something which is so far removed from the topic of the mailing list is bound to be contentious. In fact I have no real opinion about the content of the .sig in question; I was commenting on the excuse that it was system-generated, which implies that the poster has no control over it - either he should defend it or take steps to remove it (like use a gmail account if he really can't stop it happening). Peter -- Peter Bowyer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
