--On 3 November 2006 16:38:19 -0600 Mar Matthias Darin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, > Chris Lightfoot writes: >> no! you need to ask the recipient of the mail whether they >> wanted to receive it. That is the only way you can tell >> whether it was spam or not -- users don't typically care >> about idiotic conditions which ISPs try to apply to them >> or to other people (and rightly so). > > If the system was set up properly to begin with, the only results you > should have to evaulate is what your end-user has already determined as > spam. Any message that is suspicious should always be tagged with a warn > first. Except that the holy grail of spam filtering is to save the "recipient" from being troubled by the spam. > Then it goes to the user. Finally, the user responds with a this > is spam or not spam. > Once the message has been identified as spam by the user, there should be > no further need for the user to continually identify it. Subsequently, > during your log analysis, there should be a cross reference to the actual > spam IP addresses reported. -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
