On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 04:39:21PM +0000, Ian Eiloart wrote: > Well, I think that there are spam filters that are more reliable than > humans at detecting spam. That is; the spam filters get fewer false > positives.
That's obviously not possible. -- ``Nothing says `unprofessional job' like wrinkles in duct tape.'' (seen on the Internet) -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
