Philip Hazel wrote: > On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Jakob Hirsch wrote: > >> I'd say so. There were some people on the list stumbling over that, so >> it seems to be not that obvious. Probably even in detail, like "It is >> not set on outgoing connections, as Exim does not know the address the >> OS will choose." > > But it *is* set on outgoing connections - to the value it had when the > message was received!
- ah.. you mean it is stored in the undelivered queue the same as acl_m variables on exiting acl_smtp_data? ...and one *does not* have to go thru the Tinker-to-Evers-to-Chance handoff to assure the stored value is available to router/transport sets? > > Maybe $interface_address and $interface_port should be renamed as > $received_interface_address and $received_interface_port. Would that > help? Immensely so! Or even: in_ip and in_port > Otherwise, yes, I'll put in words to clarify all of this. > -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
