Hi I heartily agree and I am taking on board all advice regarding static addresses / smart hosts etc. I was more annoyed at the analogy with airports etc. and I wanted to counter it as not being a valid basis for justifying what people out there are doing
sorry for putting this view on the list as I guess you are right it is rather off topic Thanks again for all those who have advised me without condescending to me Kind Regards Hill ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marc Sherman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 12:27 PM Subject: Re: [exim] SORBS > Hill Ruyter wrote: >> Hi >> >> I understand all your points and they are all very valid >> however should it be the case that someone be completely blocked purely >> on >> the basis of a dynamic IP ? > > Why are you arguing with us? We're not saying that blocking you is > right, or moral, or even wise. We're simply saying that it's going to > happen. That's not opinion, it's a fact of the internet today. We didn't > decided to do it to you, we're just warning you that it's the truth. > > Sadly, you're not the first person to try to argue this here, and the > last person who tried it didn't manage to change the internet by > fighting with the users list of a single MTA; you're not going to, either. > > - Marc > > > -- > ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users > ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ > ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/ > -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
