Marc Haber wrote: > On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 07:24:15 +0200, Ian FREISLICH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> Marc, how often do you get this message? > > not any more, I was being stupid. > >> If it's easy to duplicate, >> perhaps the output of tcpdump on your loopback interface might help. >> Also, what does the SA child process state look like? Ours look >> like 'IIBIIIIBIIIIIIBIBIIIIIIIIIIIII' most of the time, but at the >> times you get this message, I'd expect 'BBBBB' - all children busy. >> This should be easy to verify in your logs. > > |[4/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ grep "child states" /var/log/syslog/syslog| cut -d\ > -f6- | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr > | 522 prefork: child states: II > | 40 prefork: child states: IB > | 11 prefork: child states: BI > | 6 prefork: child states: III > | 6 prefork: child states: BB > | 5 prefork: child states: BBI > | 4 prefork: child states: BII > | 3 prefork: child states: IBI > | 1 prefork: child states: IBB > |[5/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
I just re-read this thread in the archives so I don't think this question has already been asked. :) Does anyone know where to find the definitions of the 'child states' in spamd? I've looked around but have not been able to find anything. thanks, mikeS -- Michael F. Sprague | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.saneinc.net | Provider of SpamOnion anti-spam service System and Network Engineering (SaNE), Inc -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
