Dave Evans wrote: > Whichever SMTP client said "HELO James" is in the wrong for violation of > RFC2821 (that command does not match the HELO command's syntax).
This was over authenticated SMTP, from an end user using outlook express, whilst I know that's wrong i think it's pretty normal - however, that's not the issue here, the issue is with the message-id and not the HELO. > If the message was outright rejected because of lack of an FQDN in the > Message-ID, I wouldn't say that's /wrong/, but I would say it's inadvisable. I'd like to draw attention to your message-id here: Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It seems that message-id without a FQDN for the latter part is reasonably common. As far as I can tell, there is no exim option to replace message-id's anyway, I understand it will add them if they are missing but that is not the case here. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
