On Sat, Nov 25, 2006, Ian P. Christian wrote: > A user on a server of mine recently forwarded me this:
> --------------------------------------------------- > Your message triggered a spam alert on my system (i.e. it didn't show as > definitely spam but it contained warning signs). > Checking, the problem is the header line: > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [cut for brevity] > Though other algorithms will work, it is RECOMMENDED that the right > hand side contain some domain identifier (either of the host itself or > otherwise) such that the generator of the message identifier can > guarantee the uniqueness of the left hand side within the scope of > that domain. MTA is not unconditionally required to abide to either SHOULD or in this case, what it is RECOMMENDED to. A MTA that violates SHOULDs isn't non-RFC-compliant. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
