On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 08:10:47AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Sat, 2006-11-18 at 16:08 +0000, Miles Sabin wrote: > > I noticed that you've disabled sa-exim in recent Exim spec files. I know > > that sa-exim has mostly been superceded by exim ACLs, but there's one > > feature which I don't think can easily be replicated: the ability to > > use SpamAssassin's report_safe option to have spam delivered as an > > attachment with the report as the primary message body. > > > > Would you consider reinstating sa-exim? Or can you point me to somewhere > > documenting how to get the same effect with exim ACLs (which doesn't > > involve passing spam through SA twice or me having to write security- > > critical transport filter scripts)? > > I'm not entirely averse to reinstating sa-exim if it can still do things > that Exim alone cannot. It should be fairly easy for you to build it > yourself still, too -- it's only one #define in the specfile.
sa-exim can also be built in a separate package independent of the mail exim build. Would you like to split it that way? I've done that for ATrpms and I could provide the neccessary specfile patches. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
pgpW5a0RsZNU0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
