Steve Wray wrote: > And if you want it to do handy things like, oh I don't know how about > *not* bouncing spam or viruses, you will need the extra patches (DJBs > philosophy on email seems to be that all mail should be either delivered > or bounced. Very 1980's :)
Nod. I've used it for a few too many years myself. It did an excellent job doing what it was specified to do, a decade ago (NOT having root holes like Sendmail, and not being such a resource pig either), but the world has moved on and qmail hasn't, unless you go puzzling over third-party patches. Finding a project that's currently maintained and has a lot of smart people working on it and that's useful out-of-the-box is a wonderful thing. -- Anthony de Boer -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
