On Thursday 30 November 2006 16:48, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 03:22:32PM -0000, ROGERS Richard wrote: > > >> May I ask why you decided to use sa-exim instead of exim's built-in > > >> content scanning interface? > > > > > > Well, you can but I cannot answer, as I don't know :) > > > > We (and others, I think) use it because it allows use of SpamAssassin's > > report_safe option, which I don't think the built-in facility allows > > (correct me if I'm wrong - that's how it seemed in testing earlier in > > the year). This is a good option when you use an Outlook client (maybe > > others?) as the spam content is not straight in your preview pane. > > Actually, report_safe doesn't really work even with SA-Exim, because > it doesn't seem to be able to modify message body. I thought it was able, > but lately it seems that it's not :/
It should be able, but you have to set SARewriteBody: 1 in sa-exim.conf. How
doesn't it work?
--
Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpJR97BO8CdV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
