On Fri, Dec 01, 2006, John W. Baxter wrote: >> I'm curious about this one particular item. Isn't it correct to >> always block dynamic IP ranges? There's nothing but spam from them. I >> assume that every non-spam-sender has a static IP range. > [...] (I know of a cable provider in an Oregon coastal town which > created static IPs by setting DHCP lease expiration to 3 years, and > assigning out of the regular pool. (I suspect they've come up with a > working method by now.)
I wouldn't whitelist such a provider; clients' leases are easily faked. I use NJABL's and SORBS' lists for blocking dynamic addresses, I don't know of any false positives yet. -- Unix stuff :: http://tehran.lain.pl Yet Another RBL :: http://rbl.lain.pl -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
