On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Chris Lightfoot wrote: > But if you wanted a to offer a useful hook for the odd > occasions where this is necessary, how about an optional > string expansion which is given the SMTP reply code and > string and context of the mail being sent, and expands to > either nothing meaning `treat the reply exactly as it says > on the tin', or to a new fake reply code and string which > exim will then use instead of the real one? Obviously it > should also log when such rewriting occurs....
While I have provided several (many?) RFC-ignoring options in the past, this does have a "one-too-far" feel for me. Too dangerously close to your sig: > -- > ``A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any invention in > human history -- But there's nothing to stop anybody from adding this to the wishes in Bugzilla (if it's not already there). Somebody may pick it up some day. You never know. -- Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
