On Friday 15 December 2006 10:39, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
> my own stupidity or unability to read/understand the documentation?  (exim
> 4.63)
>
>     spamd_address = ssl.schlittermann.de 783
>
> failed with 'network unreachable' (in the exim log) when exim tried to
> connect the spamd server.
>
>     spamd_address = 212.80.235.130 783
>
> works.

As I can't see any name resolution code in spam.c, your intelligence is 
probably fine.

> The error message is somewhat confusing.  And: I didn't understand from
> the spec, that it has to be an *IP address*...  And I do not see if this
> option gets expanded (because I'd like to use a dnsdb lookup to get the
> IP address).

No, sorry, AFAICS it's not expanded either. Please file a wishlist bug with 
Bugzilla.

-- 
Magnus Holmgren        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                       (No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)

  "Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for 
   Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing your rack)" -- Dave Evans

Attachment: pgpU0AJSADq7f.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users 
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/

Reply via email to