Roy Coates wrote: > >> If not, please check out my reply: >> http://www.exim.org/mail-archives/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20061218/msg00074.html > > Many thanks Marc, I'll check that out. I'm a little concerned now that > the packaged debian edition of exim has been 'tweaked' such that the > standard solution to this problem doesn't work.
The most important things are points 1 and 3. Post the unobfuscated debugging output, along with your virtual host router, and we can figure out what's wrong. Marc Haber is probably right when he suggests that your virtual router is too late; remember that routers are tried in order for each address, and the first one that accepts the address wins. If you have to start tweaking existing routers in the debian config, then you'll probably do best taking this to the debian mailing list, but it sounds like you've just added a new router, so this list can help you just fine with that. FWIW, I had a working virtual host setup with Debian configs for at least a year before I got fed up with package updates breaking my customizations and switched to a hand-rolled config file. - Marc -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
