--On 3 January 2007 14:34:59 -0500 Wakko Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been searching for information about why it is a good idea to use 587 > instead of 25 but have not found anything convincing. I have hit a brick > wall where I work since they think that 587 is non-standard (Even after > showing them RFC 4409) and thus is not wise. Can anyone provide me with > any links or anything that would argue this case? There's a wikipedia entry here, <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mail_submission_agent>, which I worked up a little yesterday. You might like to extend it a little, and point your boss there! > Unfortunately, email > archives are not valid for this. > > -- > Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals > Got Gas??? -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
