On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 23:24 +0000, Graeme Fowler wrote: > On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 00:22 +0100, Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote: > > okay, perhaps it makes sense, but their claim that it is Policy Based is > > not true. I was surprised to find one of our C-nets in the PBL, this > > was certainly not added by us, and our terms of use do not prohibit the > > use of port 25. > > Depending on granularity, I would expect that "small" blocks - say /22 > and smaller - may get listed in the PBL as part of a larger assignment > sub-allocated by an ISP acting as an LIR or equivalent. > > I wouldn't be at all surprised to see smaller "upstream" ISPs just > listing their entire RIPE delegations, regardless of the sub-allocations > they have made. It's incorrect, but very easy to do - if you have > several hundred blocks to manage. > > Did you get your block delisted without issue?
I've been unable to find contact information (let me know off-list if you have an address I can use). I was able to submit a single IP via the web interface. it is of course protected by both captcha and e-mail confirmation, so I don't much appreciate the prospect of repeating the process 255 times... -- Kjetil T. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
