Sometime around Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:45:13 +0000, it may be that Ian
Eiloart wrote:
> > acl_smtp_rcpt = check_recipient_${if eq {$interface_port}{25}
> > {mta}{msa}}
>
> What about people doing message submission on port 25? The fact that
> you provide port 587 for MSA doesn't mean that people are bound to
> use it.I provided an example of how *I* do it, and we do insist that people do message submission on 587 (and 465) ... we've long maintained that we do not support users submitting directly to tcp/25 because of the stringent checking that goes on there. > We provide MSA on a different set of IP addresses. It certainly keeps > our MSA logs clear of spam rejections, cos spammers don't even > attempt to connect to our MSA server - even on port 25! You could still do different ACLs for different interface addresses. -- Mike Meredith, Senior Informatics Officer University of Portsmouth: Hostmaster, Postmaster and Security "Why are we hiding from the police, daddy?" "Because we use vi, son, and they use emacs."
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
