Peter Bowyer wrote: > On 09/01/07, Phill Harvey-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > <snip> > You can configure the behaviour at this point - whether you blackhole > them or reject them is up to you - rejecting is generally better > because a non-zero percentage will be genuine mis-typed addresses > which should be notified to the sender.
However, rejecting however will still send a copy of the email back to the supposed sender, which for the most part will be spam, rather than a genuine email, so the overall effect is that someone still gets spammed. Dunno If there's a good solution to that problem tho :) Cheers. Phill. -- Phill Harvey-Smith, Computer Technician, Department of Biological Sciences, Warwick University. Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Phone: 024 7652 8385. "The Days' as dark as the night is long" -- U2, Ultraviolet. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
