On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > On Thursday 01 February 2007 13:09, Philip Hazel wrote: > > A thought: as I wrote this, it occurred to me that maybe there is a way > > that Exim can take note of having obeyed "delay", and if so, force out > > its output buffer after it has written the next response, instead of > > waiting until it has run out of input. If possible, that would solve > > this issue automatically. Any views on this idea? > > Would it cause trouble if Exim flushed its output as soon as it encounters > a "delay" modifier?
I suppose that's another way of doing it, but it seemed to me that it might be better to do the flush after it has done the delay. I suspect that it doesn't much matter which way round it is done. But I am really interested in views as to whether doing the automatic flush is a good idea or not. -- Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
