On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, Robert Bannocks wrote: > Hmmm.. The whilst your comments are correct there are a lot of broken > mail systems submitting mail like this. Many of them, as in this case, > are very old and not suited to being changed!
Eventually, all things must change. > This one is running an > ancient version of sendmail (a very good reason for putting it behind > exim) and I think there is a wider need to cope with situations like > this. You might like to investigate the SMTP-time rewriting facilities, though I guess that won't help with such addresses in From: lines. But they could probably be caught by rewriting as well. > If nothing else the differing behaviour of exim -bt and the SMTP > dialogue needs addressing as this is confusing. -bt and -bv test *recipient* addresses. Did you try -bvs? -- Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
