On 06/02/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It seems like it would only take a couple little "tweaks" of the code to > implement a 'spf_helo' [I found out '-' doesn't work :( ] check that could > work in the HELO ACL (I think I have something workable). This would at > least give people the option. From what I'm seeing on the SPF discussion > lists, it seems like checking at HELO is becoming more popular.
Perhaps what's needed is an optional second argument to 'spf = xxxx', with the same syntax as 'spam = ' ... spf = xxxx : helo spf = xxxx : mfrom ... preserving the existing behaviour if the second argument is missing, of course. > > >I was wondering if I had time to look at using perl calls to the new > >Mail::SPF module to have a bit more of a play...... > > > > I started with the perl Mail:SPF modules and had everything working, HELO > included, but I was getting occasional problems connecting to the spfd. I > know that I'm running on a very tiny machine and that might be the problem. > That's why I started looking into the integrated libspf2 solution. > I agree, it probably should be supported. I just mocked up the Mail::SPF HELO check, seems to be functionally OK, but performance is a worry. Peter -- Peter Bowyer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
