What about 'run' or 'execute'? The object is not to just expand something, its to do something.
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [email protected] cc: (bcc: Dan Mitton/YD/RWDOE) Subject: Re: [exim] [patch] "do nothing" ACL modifier LSN: Not Relevant User Filed as: Not a Record On Wednesday 07 February 2007 16:37, Philip Hazel wrote: > On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Renaud Allard wrote: > > > I think it'll be tricky to pick a single "verb" that will convey the > > > effect it has without potential confusion. > > That is becoming quite clear! > > Given that this is a "condition", I suppose we could call it "true", but > then I suppose we would also need "false". Hmm. Maybe that would be > useful? > > > What about nullexpand ? > > or "justexpand" I don't think it matters what it's called. Users will have to read the manual to find it anyway - it's not something you can simply guess. -- Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] (No Cc of list mail needed, thanks) "Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing your rack)" -- Dave Evans -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
attpxrvf.dat
Description: Binary data
-- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
