On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 16:30 +0000, John Horne wrote: > Anyone know if there is a reason why sender verification should fail > with BATV addresses? We don't use BATV ourselves, but have received a > report from a user that they were not receiving certain mail messages. > It seems that the sender address, batv signed, was not passing the > sender verification check. > > A simple test to the sending host on port 25 gave this output (some of > it deliberately mangled to hide certain info): > > ============================================= > telnet mailgw1.kongsberg.com 25 > Trying 193.71.180.98... > Connected to mailgw1.kongsberg.com (193.71.180.98). > Escape character is '^]'. > 220 KONGSBERG secure smtp receiver > helo jh.asx.plymouth.ac.uk > 250 OK > mail from: <> > 250 OK > rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 501 This system is not configured to relay mail (r) to > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for 141.163.18.143 > quit > 221 kongsberg.com closing > Connection closed by foreign host. > ============================================= > > Is this the sending server being misconfigured, or it objecting to the > sender verification for some reason?
If it's really sending MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> but not accepting bounces to that address, then it would appear that it's simply misconfigured. -- dwmw2 -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
