On Thursday 08 February 2007 12:10, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 10:19 +0000, Philip Hazel wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > > + { "search_error_message", vtype_stringptr, &search_error_message
> > > },
> >
> > I'll take a look at that.
>
> Out of interest rather than an immediate desire... I see that there are
> other people committing to CVS occasionally. I think I also have commit
> access to CVS, so theoretically I could also do so.
I can confirm that.
> Under what
> circumstances (if any) would that be acceptable? Do we get you to
> approve each commit in advance; are there any existing guidelines? I'm
> not even aware of any informal convention about it, if such exists.
I don't know, but I guess that if you break something, you fix it, at
least. :-)
--
Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
"Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for
Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing your rack)" -- Dave Evans
pgp6qHPCMjVOo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
