On Saturday 10 February 2007 15:49, John Robinson wrote:
> I'm running CentOS 4. I'm finally fed up with coping with Exim 4.43 as
> supplied with CentOS 4, so I got 4.66 from atrpms.net. The following
> authenticator used to work correctly:
>
> plain:
> driver = plaintext
> public_name = PLAIN
> server_prompts = :
> server_condition = ${if pam{$2:${sg{$3}{:}{::}}}{yes}{no}}
> server_set_id = $2
>
> But now with my 4.66, and with $X replaced with $authX, I get:
> 2007-02-10 14:34:50 plain authenticator failed for yuiop.plus.com
> ([192.168.1.10]) [81.174.136.241]: 435 Unable to authenticate at present
> (set_id=john): Module is unknown
The error message "Module is unknown" comes from PAM itself. I haven't studied
the PAM code extensively, so I can't say what the exact problem is; it could
be that a PAM module referenced in the PAM config is missing, or that it
couldn't be loaded.
--
Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
"Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for
Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing your rack)" -- Dave Evans
pgp4QXQVRW8ec.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
