On Friday 09 February 2007 12:34, Peter Bowyer wrote: > On 09/02/07, Ian Eiloart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It also works if you think of "developers" as inclusive of everyone > > involved in the development process, including those with something to > > say about functional requirements or design, as well as coders. > > I guess so - but the typical traffic on exim-dev concerns bugs, > patches, discussions on how to implement features and so on, and > bugzilla update notifications. That traffic doesn't mix well with what > we need to discuss now, hence my proposal for a separate forum.
Shouldn't all current exim-users subscribers have an interest in future
versions (real, but perhaps not perceived)? If so, functional requirements
could be discussed on -users, while discussion about the realisation of those
requirements could be diverted to -dev.
A dedicated list may still be a good idea, but I think there should still be
two "levels".
--
Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
"Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for
Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing your rack)" -- Dave Evans
pgp6K65Bt1Jgf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
