On Wednesday 21 February 2007 12:10, Ian Eiloart wrote: > --On 21 February 2007 10:36:52 +0000 Jeremy Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Magnus Holmgren wrote: > >> The simplest syntax would be if "<n" meant that newline (\n) is the > >> separator > > > > That would, to me, be trying to say that "n" is the separator. > > > > - Jeremy > > So, maybe <\n would work? Or maybe use HTML entities (or some other well > known method of representing characters), for better flexibility? eg: > <@
See the other branch. I'd also like to suggest one more thing: When the
separator is a control character (or space), quoting by doubling should *not*
apply, because in most cases that will not be what we want.
> Perhaps perl compatible regular expressions could work: </[\t\n]/ with
> </\// required to use a slash.
Now things are getting out of hands...
--
Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
"Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for
Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing your rack)" -- Dave Evans
pgp71eaxwipfK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
