Marco Wessel wrote:
> Interestingly, I just had a very similar problem of return-paths
> being mangled:
>
> LOG: 1HJjfO-00030H-Pf <= "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"@mediamatic.nl
> H=ip3e83cd10.speed.planet.nl [62.131.205.16] P=smtp
> A=PLAIN:[EMAIL PROTECTED] S=408
I was getting this behaviour (in the From:) with just:
control = submission
Adding the /sender_retain fixed the "From" and Sender not to be
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"@bis-internet.co.uk. With this
setting enabled the From line is as I sent it
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]", (which is what I want), BUT the
Sender: header is set to [EMAIL PROTECTED] which NOT
what I want (I want this to be [EMAIL PROTECTED] aswell).
Basically this behaviour breaks things; certain MUAs reply to the
Sender address, and bounces goto this "nonexistant" address; which
is not good when this host is acting as a Smarthost. Futher to my
confusion is that if we "trust" an IP in an ACL with:
accept hosts = +relay_from_hosts
control = submission
And send EXACTLY the same email, the submission mode doesnt "mangle"
the From and doesn't add a Sender:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: test Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:21:14 +0000
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: swaks v20061116.0 jetmore.org/john/code/#swaks
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regards
D.
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
