On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > My idea is that expansion strings should be parsed first, then evaluated. > That > would make distinguishing parse errors from other expansion failures easier.
1. I think I put your previous message on the Exim wiki Exim5 discussion ... checks ... yes, I did. It's here: http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/Exim5/expansion Obviously, people are free to discuss things wherever they want, but perhaps there should be a consensus as to whether to use the wiki or the mailing list for this. 2. Please note that I am not paying any attention to anything that says "Exim 5" because I am assuming this is long-term stuff that will not involve me in its implementation. -- Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
