Jeff Lasman wrote: > On Friday 02 March 2007 09:34 am, Marc Perkel wrote: > > >> Well, I used to be a big reiser fan but ext3 has caught up in many >> ways and I'm leaning Ext3 because that's what I have and unless >> someone convinces me that it's definitely a mistake I think I'm >> sticking with it. Isn't there some new indexing feature that solves >> the big directory issue? >> > > Marc, we did the conversion recently on our DirectAdmin boxes, and I had > some hair-raising moments during the conversion when we saw some > incredibly huge mailboxes with large amounts of files rsulting from the > conversion, but all went well. I don't know enough about the numbers, > but I don't think we're going to hit the limits. > > I would have considered ReiserFS if not for Hans's personal problems, > and Suse's consequent (?) decision to drop support for it in future > releases. But I now worry about future development of ReiserFS, and I > don't want to use it on anything new. > > Jeff >
I'm hoping that all I need to do is shut down the server, run a conversion program, change the transport, and turn it back on. I'll be running some tests and try to get used to maildir before I make the switch. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
