Magnus Holmgren wrote: > On Thursday 29 March 2007 23:27, Marc Perkel wrote: > >> If a domain has a policy of signsall=1 and there is no signature - is >> that good enough to reject the email? >> > > That's up to you if you think that every domain that declares that policy > actually follows it. Maybe the probability is greater than for domains with > SPF records ending in "-all". > > >> If a message is signed but result is badsig - can I reject it? >> > > That's up to you, but it's not generally recommended, I believe, as the > chance > is too great that some relay alters the message in a way that breaks the > signature. >
I see - so altering the message in any way breaks the signature. I should probably ignore bad signatures then. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
