On 03/04/07, Ian Eiloart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --On 2 April 2007 18:14:17 +0200 Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 06:04:45PM +0300, Michael Zanin wrote: > >> Dear Collegues, > >> > >> before two suns will meet together in my head, > >> > >> Is it possible to route messages on the base of > >> > >> " X-headers " > > > > This is exactly what I need too. > > No matter what I tried, it seems that $header_* is not defined/usable > > in a router definition :/ (See my previous mail) > > > > -- > > Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > The problem with this (in most environments) is that you can only route a > message to one location based on the headers. In most environments, you > want to route according to the recipient address (not necessarily the > domain).
I think what the OP is trying to do is make smarthost determination based on the contents of a header - which should be eminently do-able provided the router concerned is set to verify=no and he supplies a 'dummy' router for recipient verification. > It may be that email headers aren't available during routing, for that > reason. They are - the confusion was that they're not available during recipient verification for obvious reasons. Peter -- Peter Bowyer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
