jean-paul natola wrote: *snip*
>>> THEN test the acl_m19 (or whatever) value before invoking scanning.> > > > it definatley triggered the fact that it was over one meg- but it still was > scanned; > Having *set* the value / flag, did you not then test it to see what was to be done/not? Bill > > X-Spam-Flag: NOX-Oversize: Message too large to scan.X-Spam-Score: -98.1 > (---------------------------------------------------)X-Spam-Report: Spam > detection software, running on the system "milter.fci", has identified this > incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to > this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If > you have any questions, see The administrator of that system for details. > Content preview: Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and > industry-leading spam and email virus protection. [...] Content analysis > details: (-98.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name > description ---- ---------------------- > -------------------------------------------------- 0.6 NO_REAL_NAME > From: does not include a real name -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address > is in the user's white-list 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message > has _________________________________________________________________ Connect > to the next generation of MSN Messenger > http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/default.aspx?locale=en-us&source=wlmailtagline -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
