On 2007-05-21 at 12:11 +0200, Peter Thomassen wrote: > > In example 2, mail for @sub.glv.at should be processed just fine, as > > it's a CNAME pointing to something which resolves. > > So, example 2 "valid"?
Yes. > No, mail.a4a.de resolves directly to 195.225.198.14. The first example > actually is about two requests, one for mail.peter-thomassen.de and one for > mail.glv.at (not for mail.a4a.de!). The difference is that there are MX RR *blinks* I'm sorry, mental block and I just didn't see that. I've also just noticed that I didn't CC the list on my previous responses but you replied to the list. I'll resend those to the list to have a complete archive including the documentation pointers I gave; sorry for making you see them twice. -Phil -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
