Marc Sherman wrote: > Ian Eiloart wrote: >> I say keep it as it is, but add an explanation: If you're asking a >> question, it's presumably because you don't know how to answer it. If you >> don't know how to answer it, you don't know whether the details that you're >> obfuscating are relevant to answering the question. Sometimes, questions >> can't be answered because relevant information is obfuscated. >> >> Also, there's a middle way. Replace the quantifiers with vague quantifiers >> such as "some", instead of trying to measure the amount. > > Just to clarify, in the hopes of discouraging people from replying to > Ian and starting another heated discussion; the question at hand is > _not_ "obfuscation: is it really bad?" We're voting on the > meta-question: "do 'many' members of the exim list refuse to answer > questions with obfuscated details?" >
It is not that I refuse to answer them. It's more than there is generally no way to do it and involves much more work than if they included proper info.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
