Marc Sherman wrote: > Mike Cardwell wrote: >> "Many people on the Exim mailing lists refuse to answer questions posted >> with obfuscated logs or configuration files. If you post obfuscated >> details on the mailing list, you may receive a reply directing you to >> this page. If you repost your question with unobfuscated logs and >> configuration files, you are a lot more likely to get a helpful answer >> from the members of the Exim mailing lists." >> >> That's misleading. It should say: >> >> "_A minority_ of people on the Exim mailing lists refuse to answer >> questions posted with obfuscated logs or configuration files. If >> you post obfuscated details on the mailing list, you may receive >> a reply directing you to this page. If you repost your question >> with unobfuscated logs and configuration files, you are _very >> slightly_ more likely to get a helpful answer from the members >> of the Exim mailing lists." > > I recommend that we put this to a simple vote, with a ban on commentary > along with votes, to avoid the heated tempers that often arise when this > subject comes up. > > My vote: keep it the way it is (obviously -- I wrote that paragraph). > > - Marc >
stet Bill -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
