Quoting Renaud Allard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Do much people here on this list use "verify = header_syntax usage" to > deny messages. I was just looking at my logs and it seems most mails > tagged by this kind of rule are ham. so I was wondering if/how people > here use (or not) this ACL.
I had it hit ham too in situations where 'requesting the sending party to fix their problem' wasn't as easy as it should be due to admins in a severe state of cluon-deprevation. It's disabled for quite a while now in my config. You could ofcourse make it warn with some header, and use that header in SpamAssassin to adjust the score accordingly. -Sndr. -- | A bicycle can't stand alone; it is two tired. | 1024D/08CEC94D - 34B3 3314 B146 E13C 70C8 9BDB D463 7E41 08CE C94D
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
